Page last updated on:
Background
Interim Parking Reform Ordinance Approved January 13, 2025
On January 13, 2025, after a public hearing on the topic, Bellingham City Council approved an interim ordinance eliminating Bellingham’s minimum parking requirements – rules that define the number of parking spaces that must be developed in Bellingham.
While the ordinance is in effect, new development projects are not required to provide vehicular parking. This allows property owners and developers to right-size the amount of parking they provide based on anticipated demand, rather than City mandates. While the ordinance provides significantly more flexibility, developers must still provide a certain amount of bicycle parking based on the type of residential or commercial use, and considerations such as ADA requirements and safety will continue to be taken into account
Status
On November 3, 2025, City Council held a public hearing and voted to approve a six-month extension of the interim ordinance. Because of the extension, the ordinance will be in effect until July 28, 2026, unless extended again.
Feedback Opportunities
While the public hearings have already occurred, this page will be updated when there are additional feedback opportunities.
Why is the City making parking development fully flexible?
Parking requirements limit what can be done with land and have led to an overabundance of parking in areas of the city. At the same time, the need for additional housing and environmental and climate mitigation measures have increased. Parking requirements don’t reflect our current priorities – the last time Bellingham’s parking requirements were substantially updated was in the 1960s.
Supporting housing opportunities
Parking takes up our limited buildable land that could be used for housing. Parking mandates limit the number of housing units that can be built on a site because, in order to develop a housing unit, a certain number of parking spaces must be created to support that unit. If required parking can’t be built, then the housing unit can’t be built.
According to research published in November 2024, making parking fully flexible – in other words, doing away with minimum parking requirements – can help spur more housing availability.
- Parking requirements often limit the number of units that can be built due to limited space for parking on a site. The cost of constructing the parking can also make the project unfeasible.
- Each parking space generally costs more than $20,000 in Bellingham and can be upwards of $60,000 per space for structured parking. Homeowners and renters ultimately end up covering these costs through increased purchase prices or monthly rent.
- By increasing housing supply, removing parking minimums may also help stabilize housing costs.
- This change has the potential to encourage development. For instance, in 2023, the City Council agreed to eliminate parking requirements in Old Town. That change was one of several elements that supported renewed development interest in an area that went underdeveloped for decades. There are now plans to construct at least 500 new residential units in this area over the coming years.
- By not requiring every structure have a certain minimum number of parking spaces, people can make site specific decisions that allow them to use land more efficiently, and not build unused parking.
Supporting the environment and climate mitigation
Parking minimum requirements are at odds with Bellingham’s climate goals. They increase urban sprawl, and they result in a greater amount of pavement or other impervious surfaces, which increases the heat island effect.
- Removing parking minimums can increase urban density, and denser urban development supports greater preservation of forested lands, agricultural lands, urban trees and other critical areas by reducing the impacts of urban sprawl.
- Removing parking minimums encourages use of alternative modes of transportation, which can help us meet our climate goals. The City’s 2018 Climate Action Plan calls for reducing vehicle trips by 27 percent by 2036 and identifies greater urban density as a requisite to support that goal.